A retrospective study of breathlessness supportive therapy on chronic refractory breathlessness in a palliative care unit.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic refractory breathlessness is a debilitating symptom which negatively affects quality of life with profound impact on physical and psychosocial functioning of patients and/or carers. Multidisciplinary based interventions which focus on non-pharmacological approach have shown to be effective. We developed a breathlessness intervention service called breathlessness supportive therapy (BST) in a palliative care unit with limited resources. The aim is to evaluate the feasibility of developing a BST service and to study the characteristics and outcome of patients with chronic refractory breathlessness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with chronic refractory breathlessness and Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea scale grade ≥ 2 who attended the BST clinic over 1 year period. BST consists of two clinic sessions 2 weeks apart. Data was retrieved from patients' medical notes and analysis done using Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients were identified. Median age was 69 years with 52% of females. 72% had non-malignant diagnoses. Median Charlson's Comorbidity Index score was 6.5. Median mMRC dyspnoea scale was 3. 47.6% had long term oxygen usage. Median Australian Karnofsky Performance Scale (AKPS) was 65 and the median baseline breathlessness visual analogue scale (VAS) was 2. 62% completed two sessions, the remaining 38% completed only one session. Mean time from BST intervention to death was 18.26 weeks, median was 22 weeks. 72% died at home, whilst 28% died in the hospital. All the patients scored 4 (somewhat agree) and 5 (strongly agree) on the overall feedback score. CONCLUSIONS: Development of a breathlessness intervention service is feasible in a resource limited setting and generally accepted by most patients. More research and prospective studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of BST in the future.

Primary vitrectomy for combined rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and choroidal detachment with or without oral corticosteroids: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: The occurrence of choroidal detachment (CD) in eyes with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is relatively uncommon (2%-4.5%). Recent reports suggest that primary vitrectomy yields better anatomic success than scleral buckling. However, for these inflamed eyes with low intraocular pressure, the influence of preoperative oral steroids on reattachment rates has not been elucidated yet. METHODS: Twenty eyes with combined RRD and CD that underwent primary vitrectomy were randomized to receive oral steroids (for 1 week) or no oral steroids before surgery. RESULTS: Preoperative clinical data such as mean age, lens status, Snellen visual acuity, duration of macular detachment, CD (size and extent), and retinal detachment characteristics (e.g., extent, number of retinal breaks, atrophic or tractional retinal break, size of retinal break, and location of retinal break) were similarly distributed in both groups. Single-operation anatomic success was 81.8% (9/11) among those patients who received preoperative oral steroids and was 66.7% (6/9) among those who did not receive preoperative oral steroids. After reoperation, anatomic success was 100% in both groups. The mean follow-up was 20.1 months. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that administration of oral steroids before primary vitrectomy in eyes with combined RRD and CD improves reattachment rates.